Answer by Thomas for Star Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the Enterprise?
Nero does attempt to at first during the surprise attack. He hits the ship hard and would have destroyed it if he hand't seen that it was the Enterprise out of all ships. From the comics we knew he...
View ArticleAnswer by Stick for Star Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the Enterprise?
It's just a mining ship, that's why. It has an advanced payload (apparently at least 25 years worth of guided missiles - so, like, 38) but its primary function is that of a simple mining ship. Enhance...
View ArticleAnswer by user1329482 for Star Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the...
From a purely practical standpoint, if Nero destroys the Enterprise in the first encounter, the movie is over--and so are any possible sequels.
View ArticleAnswer by Paul for Star Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the Enterprise?
The 2009 reboot ends Star Trek having basis in science or logic. It's now an action film more on the lines of Star Wars. (This is not of itself a bad thing). Hence the Enterprise surviving is required...
View ArticleAnswer by Shadur for Star Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the Enterprise?
Several reasons: Nero initially doesn't want to destroy the Enterprise. He wants Spock to suffer first, which is why he deliberately inflicted less than fatal damage during his surprise volley. His...
View ArticleStar Trek (2009), why does Nero not destroy the Enterprise?
In the movie, Nero is 154 years ahead of the time, and allegedly uses Borg technology - a threat unknown to the Federation at the time. How is it possible that Nero doesn't simply destroy the...
View Article
